MUKNA RAM VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN
- Court
- Rajasthan High Court
- Bench
- Jodhpur
- Date
- 18 May 2026
- Citation / case number
- CRLMP / 8059 / 2022
Summary
The petitioner sought quashing of the FIR under Section 379 IPC arising from a dispute over possession and repossession of a financed vehicle. HELD- Theft requires dishonest intention at the time of moving property. The record showed a bona fide contractual dispute, continuing proprietary interest and repossession rights, with no prima facie dishonest intent. Criminal proceedings would abuse process; FIR and consequential proceedings quashed.
Details are as published by the court or dataset. Read the court's copy before relying on or citing this judgment.